For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to widen his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, securityholes.science like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative purposes should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public data from a broad range of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and setiathome.berkeley.edu hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm unsure how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.